peer review, Tag

This episode of Climate Change Roundtable titled, “The failure of peer review: Climate is Beholden to Bullying and Bad Decisions” delves into the shadowy and competitive world of climate journal…

Brown makes it difficult to ignore the decades worth of abundant observations that mainstream climate change science is not just politicized, it is big business...

Another story about 'scientists' trying to bury papers and evidence they don't like. It's Climategate deja vu.

By Jo Nova What do you do when not enough people die to suit your religion? Distort the axis and hope no one notices.

By Jo Nova Peer Review has been a sixty year experiment with no control group It’s touted as the “gold standard” of science, yet the evidence shows Peer Review is an abject failure.

By Jo Nova Peer Review has been a sixty year experiment with no control group It’s touted as the “gold standard” of science, yet the evidence shows Peer Review is an abject failure.

For the last 60 years or so, science has been running an experiment on itself.

It is increasingly apparent to all involved in safeguarding and investigating issues of research integrity that closing rings down at one publisher can simply move the problem to others...

If I had been permitted to fact-check review this paper, I would have barred it for publication because it contains a minimum of six major errors

Nature and Elsevier are agog and aghast that hundreds of junk papers filled with random word salad have been published in their esteemed journals.

Peter Boghossian has taught philosophy at Portland State University for ten years and he has just quit in protest.

Does it catch fraud or manipulations of data? No, patently not: peer reviewers are not omniscient, so they cannot divine made-up data, nor can they check all the outputs of a lab to see when they’ve simply copy-and-pasted...

It’s Skeptics have known for years that Nature was more about fashion than science. A parody from 2019. When it comes to scientific truths, even in top journals like Science and Nature, the more wrong it is, the more...

What academic freedom is left in Australia, if Professor Patrick Parkinson, Dean of Law at the University of Queensland had a paper rejected, because students and peer reviewers were concerned, not about whether the paper...

Traditional peer review can take four or more weeks to complete, but RR:C19's editorial team, led by editor-in-chief, Stefano M. Bertozzi, Professor of Health Policy and Management and Dean Emeritus of the School of Public...