At Frontiers in Psychology, it seems that users on X are now part of the peer review process.
By Jo Nova This paper shows exactly how good “Peer Review” is It’s not just that a clever AI image slipped through peer review, it’s that it was garishly fake in a supersize kind of way...
By Jo Nova This paper shows exactly how good “Peer Review” is It’s not just that a clever AI image slipped through peer review, it’s that it was garishly fake in a supersize kind of way...
By Jo Nova This paper shows exactly how good “Peer Review” is It’s not just that a clever AI image slipped through peer review, it’s that it was garishly fake in a supersize kind of way...
By Jo Nova This paper shows exactly how good “Peer Review” is It’s not just that a clever AI image slipped through peer review, it’s that it was garishly fake in a supersize kind of way...
We must also convince scientists to use those freedoms to follow the truth wherever it leads and to tell the truth even when doing so seems to conflict with other priorities.
For issues that are really important, you need to learn how to separate credible studies from unreliable ones.
This episode of Climate Change Roundtable titled, “The failure of peer review: Climate is Beholden to Bullying and Bad Decisions” delves into the shadowy and competitive world of climate journal…
Brown makes it difficult to ignore the decades worth of abundant observations that mainstream climate change science is not just politicized, it is big business...
Another story about 'scientists' trying to bury papers and evidence they don't like. It's Climategate deja vu.
By Jo Nova What do you do when not enough people die to suit your religion? Distort the axis and hope no one notices.
By Jo Nova Peer Review has been a sixty year experiment with no control group It’s touted as the “gold standard” of science, yet the evidence shows Peer Review is an abject failure.
By Jo Nova Peer Review has been a sixty year experiment with no control group It’s touted as the “gold standard” of science, yet the evidence shows Peer Review is an abject failure.
For the last 60 years or so, science has been running an experiment on itself.
It is increasingly apparent to all involved in safeguarding and investigating issues of research integrity that closing rings down at one publisher can simply move the problem to others...
- Popular Related Tags: peer review, global warming, science, climate change, intergovernmental panel on climate change, post-normal science, climate audit, remote sensing, steve mcintyre, scientific method
- Search for "peer review" on our Eco Web Search